Chicago's premiere facial & body non-surgical aesthetics

Introduction

Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are a staple in cosmetic dermatology, prized for their ability to deliver immediate enhancements with minimal downtime. Yet, the effects beneath the skin are just as significant, influencing skin structure and long-term aesthetics. This blog delves into the biochemistry of HA in the skin, comparing its impact with other popular fillers like Sculptra (poly-L-lactic acid) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), examining the type of collagen each stimulates and their potential for scarring.

Section 1: Hyaluronic Acid and Collagen Formation

Mechanism of Action: Hyaluronic acid injections are more than just skin plumpers; they trigger a biological response that enhances skin physiology. When injected, HA mechanically stretches skin fibroblasts, which respond by increasing collagen production. This response is not just filler but a stimulant for skin rejuvenation.

Type of Collagen Formed: Research indicates that HA injections primarily boost the production of Type I and Type III collagen. Type I collagen, the most abundant type, provides structural support to the skin, while Type III collagen, often associated with rapid healing, is prevalent in scar tissues but is typically replaced by Type I collagen as wound healing progresses. A study by Turlier et al. (2013) supports this, showing that HA injections increased procollagen I and III levels, signaling active collagen remodeling [(Turlier et al., 2013)](https://consensus.app/papers/association-collagen-production-stretching-matrix-vivo-turlier/e5da7ac1c96b58808dacdc6bd973cae1/?utm_source=chatgpt).

Scarring Potential: Hyaluronic acid is favored for its biocompatibility and reversibility, with minimal scarring risks. If complications arise or results are unsatisfactory, the enzyme hyaluronidase can dissolve HA fillers, safely reversing the effects.

Section 2: Sculptra (Poly-L-Lactic Acid Mechanism and Collagen Type

Sculptra operates distinctly from HA fillers. It serves as a collagen biostimulator, subtly enhancing skin appearance by prompting the body’s collagen synthesis over time. It primarily encourages the production of Type I collagen, initiating a mild inflammatory reaction that leads fibroblasts to generate new collagen fibers. This process gradually thickens and rejuvenates the skin. Scarring Potential: The inflammatory response triggered by Sculptra can occasionally lead to subdermal nodules or lumps, especially if improperly injected. Nevertheless, significant scarring is rare, with most issues resolving without intervention.

Section 3: Calcium Hydroxyapatite (Radiesse)

Mechanism and Collagen Type: Like Sculptra, CaHA fillers stimulate collagen but via a different mechanism. They provide a scaffold around which new Type I collagen can form, effectively supporting and enhancing the skin’s structure over time.

Scarring Potential: Radiesse carries a low risk of scarring due to its high biocompatibility. Although over-injection or misplacement may lead to temporary issues, these typically resolve with minimal intervention, reducing the risk of long-term scarring.

Conclusion

The choice between hyaluronic acid, Sculptra, and Radiesse depends on individual aesthetic goals and the desired duration of effects. Each treatment promotes collagen production through unique mechanisms, influencing not only immediate cosmetic outcomes but also long-term skin health and appearance. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the appropriate treatment and setting realistic expectations regarding outcomes and potential side effects. Whether seeking immediate enhancement or gradual improvement, these fillers offer versatile solutions to aging and skin degradation.

References

Turlier, V., Delalleau, A., Casas, C., Rouquier, A., Bianchi, P., Alvarez, S., … & Redoules, D. (2013). Association between collagen production and mechanical stretching in dermal extracellular matrix: in vivo effect of cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler. A randomised, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Dermatological Science, 69(3), 187-194. [https://consensus.app/papers/association-collagen-production-stretching-matrix-vivo-turlier/e5da7ac1c96b58808dacdc6bd973cae1/?utm_source=chatgpt](https://consensus.app/papers/association-collagen-production-stretching-matrix-vivo-turlier/e5da7ac1c96b58808dacdc6bd973cae1/?utm_source=chatgpt) 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *